| Title: | Mendelian Randomization With Longitudinal Exposure Data: Simulation Study and Real Data Application |
| Journal: | Statistics in Medicine |
| Published: | 22 Jan 2026 |
| Pubmed: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41567108/ |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70378 |
| URL: | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/sim.70378 |
Publication 18581
WARNING: the interactive features of this website use CSS3, which your browser does not support. To use the full features of this website, please update your browser.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Mendelian randomization (MR) is a widely used tool to estimate causal effects using genetic variants as instrumental variables. MR is limited to cross-sectional summary statistics of different samples and time points to analyze time-varying effects. We aimed at using longitudinal summary statistics for an exposure in a multivariable MR setting and validating the effect estimates for the mean, slope, and within-individual variability.</p>
SIMULATION STUDY: We tested our approach in 12 scenarios for power and type I error, depending on shared instruments between the mean, slope, and variability, and regression model specifications. We observed high power to detect causal effects of the mean and slope throughout the simulation, but the variability effect was low powered in the case of shared SNPs between the mean and variability. Mis-specified regression models led to lower power and increased the type I error.</p>
REAL DATA APPLICATION: We applied our approach to two real data sets (POPS, UK Biobank). We detected significant causal estimates for both the mean and the slope in both cases, but no independent effect of the variability. However, we only had weak instruments in both data sets.</p>
CONCLUSION: We used a new approach to test a time-varying exposure for causal effects of the exposure's mean, slope and variability. The simulation with strong instruments seems promising but also highlights three crucial points: (1) The difficulty to define the correct exposure regression model, (2) the dependency on the genetic correlation, and (3) the lack of strong instruments in real data. Taken together, this demands a cautious evaluation of the results, accounting for known biology and the trajectory of the exposure.</p>
7 Keywords
- Causality
- Computer Simulation
- Humans
- Longitudinal Studies
- Mendelian Randomization Analysis
- Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
- Regression Analysis
8 Authors
- Janne Pott
- Marco Palma
- Yi Liu
- Jasmine A. Mack
- Ulla Sovio
- Gordon C. S. Smith
- Jessica Barrett
- Stephen Burgess
Enabling scientific discoveries that improve human health